The Nonsense of “Checking Your Privilege”

monopolyguy

As far as ideological buzzwords are concerned, “Check Your Privilege” is right up there with “Rape Culture” in the hierarchy of excellent, beautifully conceived drivel. I am in awe of phrases like this, they are exactly what this blog has always been about, power through ideas. The genius of these phrases is that they do a large number of complicated things in merely a few words. They do the following,

  1. Establish ‘axioms’
  2. State the issue
  3. Frame the solution

Going through our framework with “Rape Culture” yields the following,

  1. Axiom: There exists a prevalence of rape in society
  2. The Issue: Society is a perpetrator of this rape
  3. Solution: The culture supports rape, males are those who rape, therefore males not only control culture (note the feminist framing here) but also support the culture of rape (being only the gender associated with rape).

This is a complicated set of assumptions and framing, all generated by two simple words. Their power relies in our desire to ‘hook up’ these words and phrases with our common understanding, aka our ‘shared language’. The word associations with Rape and Culture allow us to make all these complicated associations subconsciously. The trickery here is not what it is said, but what is left unsaid. All those untested assumptions, all those unchallenged ‘issues’ which get set as fact when one argues directly about how x or y isn’t rape culture at all!

By yielding to the temptation of accepting the words as cannon you have already given up any argument to the contrary. You have submitted entirely and now the results are framed for you in a way the user wishes it to be so. Namely, rape culture is bad and is perpetrated by a male dominated culture which ‘consumes’ women and objectifies them on a continual basis.

This leads us to the main course,

Check Your Privilege (stated to another person)

  1. Axiom: Your current societal status is privileged
  2. The Issue: You are ungrateful of your superior status, and are ignorant of its ramifications (your privilege has not been checked)
  3. Solution: Not only should you feel ashamed/guilty about your superior status, you should be actively working to mitigate it via association with those groups who seek to diminish privilege. Privilege is generally associated with an unfair advantage over other people, therefore to be ignorant of your treasured status would be an insult. Given that most people are believers in meritocracy, than you must accept that privilege is not just bad economically but also in a social sphere.

More can be derived from these three simple words. Checking your privilege is a direct challenge for you to justify your current social status and what you are doing to ‘reduce’ privilege in your world. However, I find myself unimpressed by the use of this term by leftists. Not just because I refute the pre-suppositions, but because I reject the pompous arrogance that accompanies it.

I want to tackle this phrase in two pieces. The first is the economic argument, the second is the social one.

The Economic Argument:

If you want to think about this in a historical perspective, “Privilege Checking” is nothing new, even though the phrasing is. It is merely a way of someone in a lower economic status to express not just envy, but a desire to ingratiate themselves with a sense of moral superiority in the face of seemingly unfair social power against them. It is a defense mechanism, that success in the societal game is merely the result of chance rather than any merit.

The irony I see with this sort of reasoning is that leftists do not generally support meritocracy; even though they give lip service to it. The support for labor unions is a prime example of this. While the private market place is still full of “who you know” rather than “what you know,” unions obscure this picture to the most unfair advantage of those who do not come from a union family. The labor union is the economic personification of “Check Your Privilege,” but in reverse.

My economic privilege is something I should be ashamed of. No matter how hard I work, or how much I suffer. We should all feel guilty; either being born into wealth or producing it through your own determination. Those who grew up poor and became wealthy are not exempt from this economic Privilege Checking. They are just as guilty as the trust fund babies. The argument from the leftist is that the capitalist system is not a meritocracy, it is ruled by oligarchs who pillage and stockpile rather than produce.

franklinLike it or not, these entitled, rich, white aristocrats probably did more for human equality than any of you ever will.

You must give sympathy to those who fall off the ladder, either because they do not participate or because they are incapable of the climb. The answer from “checking your privilege” In an economic sense is to eliminate it. But how?

A leftist would argue that the best way to do so is to squash or chain private capital. I would argue that at no point in human history have we lived in a society so infatuated with meritocracy, which is due to capitalism and the enlightenment rather than socialism and Marxism. I think it as an historical fact, Capitalism more so than any other economic system yet invented, has been more successful in getting people to make decisions based on merit rather than on family, race, sex, or class.

But this is for another day.

The Social Argument:

The most powerful phrasing of “check your privilege” has to do with racial and gender status. Namely, white males are treated as demi-gods while people of color are cast to the dirt.

The fact remains that to exist confers privilege. Any pool of competitive advantage of another is thus defined as privilege. A physically active man, a naturally intelligent women, or a white man. All confer privilege whether deserved or not. “Checking” this is to make an egalitarian statement of the worst type. That is, egalitarianism for the sake of it without any serious purpose.

tabooMaybe we should envy the great egalitarianism of human history, yes, tribal societies are great examples to live by

The trouble remains with how the phrase deals with the patriarchy question. Certainly gender inequality has existed since civilization began (and, depending on your viewpoint, since humanity began). The issue is that no existing male is responsible for the actions of prior males. I state with certainty that the son should not pay for the sins of the father. As a result the current male generation is morally exempted from the atrocities of prior oppression. However, checking your privilege makes this association explicit. I am guilty for the circumstances I have been thrust into. The white man, rather than the white woman must pay his dues. The black male, over the black woman must pay his, and so on.

But beyond this, let us take the current situation of any male in (almost all) societies. In the modern day these men now indeed enjoy a benefit over their black, or Hispanic, or female companions. But in modern times this is largely due to the cyclic nature of power via in-group bias more-so than a conspiracy to subjugate ‘inferior’ genders and races. Those with power subjugate those without it. It is only in very recent times (1700-current) that equality of individuals based on their existence, not heritage, has ever been serious implemented or entertained on a large scale.

I am powerless to stop the cyclic nature of power and abuse. It is a natural endeavor of humans that they prefer those who they are similar to (by any physical, or personal characteristic; be it race, blood lines, or esoteric interests). Once this process begin, exclusion and an ‘others’ is generated. Eliminating the cycle is done through a continuous revolving association with ‘others’. If the goal is to integrate society and eliminate gender/race differences, I assure you that humans will find some other criterion to oppress each other under (such as, region, location in a city, hair color, whatever).

Rant:

My issue with “Checking” my privilege is that it implies that what I’m currently doing to fight against racial or gender injustice is not enough. I need to agree, politically, with the perpetrator. I need to justify my actions to someone who feels morally superior by flinging a short, mindless phrase at me. Then of course, when digging too deep into this phrase we run into the issue of “everyone has privilege, we should just be thankful and observe that some people are more advantaged than others,“ which spirals into an obnoxious ‘race to the most disadvantaged’ argument. A pointless exercise. There will always be an oppressed. The principal question we should be working toward is how to minimize this number, and a game of back scratching between privileged people changes nothing.

Because friends, if you are privileged enough to say phrases like “Check your Privilege” rather than worrying about survival, you are probably quite a bit too privileged yourself.

Engaging in this dialogue is about as useful as going into a Starbucks “Pay it Forward” line. A nice way for generally wealthy people to do zero good and be socially pressured to feel ‘morally superior’. Get in line folks. If you think you are fighting for the oppressed by giving lip-service to actual oppression you are kidding yourself. I’ll be more impressed when you actually start doing something, rather than having pointless circular arguments on who deserves our attention.

 

How Fascism Permeates America

Declaration_independence

As much as we would like to believe that Fascism was defeated in the 40’s, it is still alive. It goes beyond Greece’s Golden Dawn, it goes past Russian Neo-Nazi’s, and it goes even further than France’s National Front. Fascist principals have pervaded every nation it has ever come in contact with. It has changed the way we view government, citizenship, and the definition of ‘Nation’. (more…)

Israel and Palestine: There Will Never Be Peace

Six_Day_War_Territories.svg

In response to a lot of posts and messages around the internet of Arab or Israeli solidarity… I have to just say it: there will never be peace between Israel and Palestine. The conflict will be continuous and will never stop until the power dynamic of the region changes. Current events do not bode well for the future of this region.

You have a super powerful Israel and a dirt poor Palestine. (more…)

The World’s Cheapest Vacation: Why Society Hates Drugs

Drugs

Drugs are an escape from reality. You don’t need to pack any bags, go to an airport, or interact with anyone. You hardly need money to do them, and by extension, you hardly have to do any productive work to receive them. All you need is $10 and an empty room, then take a small tablet, inhale a few fumes, or eat a couple grams; you’re off to space.

But society doesn’t benefit from this transaction. You don’t buy any products or participate in the social world in any way. Societies hate that. Or, to put it more succinctly, collections of people hate this sort of behavior. Why? (more…)

Turn Off The Air Conditioner

 

road-4539_640

It’s hot right now. Really hot. A kind of muggy, humid, 85 degree hot that persists long into the night. Add to that a 4th story apartment, laced with carpet, and plopped in the middle of a concrete jungle? You have a recipe for an uncomfortable week.

But, as it turns out, this is a weak sort of hardship. It’s the kind of hardship that doesn’t damage you, it steels you. It reminds you to appreciate life if the worst thing going on is some uncomfortable weather. (more…)

What is Fascism? (Without the Spin)

Fascism

Can We Stop With The B.S. Please?

Fascism has become a catch phrase; a buzz word. When making a case that the government is abusing its power we easily explain it away as Fascism. When we see ultra-nationalist groups prowl the streets of Russia shouting “Russia for Russians!” we call them Fascists.

Fascism has become synonymous with abusive authority, with absolute totalitarian dictatorship, with ruthless oppression, and with genocide. The truth is that today we live amongst modern day Fascists all over the globe from America, to Greece, to Russia, and onwards (to be explored in my next post). (more…)

Why College Isn’t About Education

For most of the western world, college is not about education. It has become a cultural rite of passage. Evidence of this are the astronomical amounts of money spent on college sports, campus housing, beautiful grounds, and superb marketing. Nassau_Hall,_Princeton College is a transition point for dependent teenagers to become independent young adults. It is used to sever the ties between the parent and the child. And it is used by society to ‘mold’ you into what it views as an ideal citizen. Society naturally constructs a set path with which you must follow and college is a missing piece of that pathway to completeness.

(more…)

Birth of a Fascist

We read of genocide in WW2 Europe, systematic torture and killings of political opponents, Kurds, and more in 1979-2003 Iraq, and less severely, xenophobia in modern day Greece and Russia. One word is used to describe the political atmosphere of these atrocities, Fascism. But this is an old story.

Propaganda

(more…)

Ideology: Why Care?

What is Ideology?

Ideology is power. It is the glue which connects citizens to allow for voluntary agreements. It is a commonly understood structure which facilitates social contracts between those with guns and those without guns.

800px-Little_Red_Riding_Hood_WPA_poster

Maybe if she had a parent escort her through that dark, scary forest…

I choose to give part of my salary willingly to the government. Partially because if I don’t they will put a gun in my face and throw me in jail, but also because I have been convinced that I am obligated to contribute to my community in an equitable way. But even more powerful is that I have convinced myself that working within the legal framework of my nation is the ‘right’ thing to do. Society has convinced me (through delicious treats) that I should play their game, and I have convinced myself that this game is a moral one to play. The latter statement is a tell-tale sign that ideology has come out in the limelight. It is the belief that certain political behaviors are moral and that to behave differently is immoral.

(more…)